JOB: LAMP Artisan

Tod Hansmann at
Fri Feb 21 20:11:27 MST 2014

On 2/21/2014 3:23 PM, Joshua Fenio wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Frederico <mfrederico at>wrote:
>> Well said.  I suppose the old idiom - "A poor workman blames his tool" is
>> apropos?
> Sure, but a good workman recognizes a broken tool when he sees one.  It's
> inarguable that PHP is a poorly designed language - if you can even argue
> that it's "designed" in the first place.

I really, really don't care about a language for its users (though 
talking to them does affect my USE of the language).

My problem with a language usually has to do with the language itself or 
its implementation.  If a language behaves differently depending on 
whether you put your curly brackets on a new line or the same line, the 
language is broken.  Like you suggested, PHP isn't actually designed, it 
was a collection of perl scripts and it expanded to an amalgamation of 
features instead of a language design.

That said, PHP is a great glue language to tie different bits of data 
together.  Again, the accessibility of it to other users isn't something 
that affects me specifically.  I don't want to work with feckless 
programmers, but there are good programmers that use PHP (typically 
because it's what they know) and there are feckless programmers that use 
Haskell.  This doesn't paint either language in my eyes, it paints 

I don't use PHP in any new projects, but maintaining something older in 
PHP isn't really a terrible thing unless it's terrible code, not because 
of PHP.  =c)

Does One-Click-Retail do 4 x 10s, perchance?  =cP

-Tod Hansmann

More information about the PLUG mailing list