Defining Terrorism

keith smith klsmith2020 at
Tue Jun 25 09:26:34 MDT 2013

The U.S. uses whatever force is necessary to achieve it's mission. I think on it's face that is terrorism.  


Keith Smith

--- On Tue, 6/25/13, Steve Meyers <steve at> wrote:

From: Steve Meyers <steve at>
Subject: Re: Defining Terrorism
To: "Provo Linux Users Group" <plug at>
Date: Tuesday, June 25, 2013, 7:20 AM

On 6/24/13 10:22 PM, S. Dale Morrey wrote:
> Terrorism - The act of inciting terror for the purposes of spreading an
> ideology.
> Also Miriam Webster defines it as "the systematic use of terror especially
> as a means of coercion"
> Either works fine.
> See
> and
> for specific details of where I'm coming from on that claim.
> We've been actively engaged in similar operations for longer and there are
> also more recent events, these were just the ones I could remember off the
> top of my head.
> I mean you do know that we trained Osama Bin Laden ourselves, and we also
> aided directly in the overthrow of the lawful government of Iran.  These
> are documented facts that our own government admits to.

I'm going to have to disagree with you here.  I'm not saying that any of these things you bring up were affairs the U.S. should have been involved in, but I don't think they qualify as "terrorism".  Meddling in the affairs of other countries?  Yes, definitely.  But I'm just not seeing anything in the links you provided to support your suggestion that the U.S. is involved in terrorism.

The closest would be Operation Cyclone, since that led to Osama bin Laden's rise.


PLUG:, #utah on
Don't fear the penguin.

More information about the PLUG mailing list