OT - Gas to hit 4.00

Grant Robinson santiago at mr-r.net
Wed Jun 18 11:09:06 MDT 2008

On Jun 17, 2008, at 5:20 PM, Corey Edwards wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 16:54 -0600, Grant Robinson wrote:
>> That makes things much clearer.  I am also sickened by this practice.
>> I grew up in an older home in Alpine, and on the way to my parents
>> house they have started a subdivision just like that.  Some of these
>> houses literally have no back yard.  That kind of thing is what I am
>> against.  I have no problem with homes that size, but I do have a
>> problem with homes that are out of proportion for the lot size (and
>> homes like that, in my mind, clearly are).  My only consolation is
>> that no one is buying those homes, so hopefully they will amend the
>> plan to make the homes smaller or the lots larger.
> I wouldn't want to live in a house like that either, but I'm not  
> certain
> I see anything wrong with it. It's just a lot more urban than what's
> traditionally been built around here. Think of the row houses in San
> Francisco or Georgetown. People are certainly paying a pretty penny  
> for
> those and they're literally right next to each other. They're
> essentially a jumbo apartment. It's not my cup of tea but it's a  
> fact of
> life for an area where land has become scarce and expensive.

Those types of houses flow.  There are a bunch of them together in an  
"urban" environment surrounded by other types of buildings that  
reinforce that flow.  If you plopped those homes down in the middle of  
the average neighborhood in Utah, they would look ridiculous and out  
of place.  Where they are, they look beautiful and classic and (in the  
case of the some of the Victorian ones) historic.  It is all about the  


More information about the PLUG mailing list