[OT] Foreign Policy

Jason Hall jayce at lug-nut.com
Fri Jan 25 09:14:20 MST 2008

On Jan 24, 2008 10:38 PM, Von Fugal <von at fugal.net> wrote:

> * Justin Findlay [Thu, 24 Jan 2008 at 21:45 -0700]
> > >  Getting off the gold standard is bad.
> >
> > I guess we've been in a bad situation for the past 112 years.
> As a matter of fact...

Actually the Gold standard has more than it's fair share of warts.  It's
largely flawed as equally as the pure GNP (Fiat) standard we run now.  This
is one of the thing that really annoys me with the politics of the
libs/cons/ and other political groups I normally associate with.  They point
at our old standard and how it must be better because of the problems we
have now.  Well we had problems them, which are massively compounded by
certain events that happened in WWII (global gold ownership, etc), plus the
effect this has on the more struggling economies.

Frankly, the gold standard is only good for those countries that currently
own the gold, and will put existing third world countries in an even harder
spot, making trade *much* more difficult.  And that's some of the smallest
concerns in terms of problems with the gold standard.

It has merits, but no more that what we are currently running (which I don't
care for either).  Some good Econ courses can help learn about other
systems, especially in the relatively new concept of global economics.


More information about the PLUG mailing list