death to gmail users!

Von Fugal von at
Fri Mar 23 10:44:29 MDT 2007

* Hill, Greg [Thu, 22 Mar 2007 at 13:01 -0700]
> > Top posting isn't lazy or stupid... it's better.  I like to see the
> most
> > recent stuff up front.  I bottom post because that's what most other
> > people want, but top posting is still better.  Of course, I'm not that
> > picky either... I'll read what interests me whether it's top-posted,
> or
> > bottom-posted.  If the email has lot's of overhead I read what
> interests
> > me, and move on.  Lot's of header and footer stuff, no biggie - I'll
> > just skip it...
> I have a feeling I'll be one of the few on this list to agree with you.
> It's a better way, but some people are set in their ways.  New
> information is first and obviously separated from the old.  Any other
> method is a waste of time for both the sender and reader.  What's worse
> is when people whine about other people not conforming to their
> preferred method.  Get over it, people.  If it bothers you that much,
> block the sender.
> Greg

So how come when I read Greg's feelings on how top posting was soo much
better, I had to scroll down several pages just to see what prompted
that silly reply?

Von Fugal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 

More information about the PLUG mailing list