SSH hank attempts bad?
Gregory_Hill at tni.com
Wed Apr 12 11:56:25 MDT 2006
Since when did list netiquette involve personally attacking someone who
didn't obey some rather arbitrary mailing list advice?
A simple "most people would prefer if you trimmed your message" would've
sufficed, IMO. Either that, or buy one of those fandangled scroll-mice
and quit caring how people prefer to reply.
But don't even get me started on those top-posting morons!! :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-bounces at plug.org [mailto:plug-bounces at plug.org] On Behalf
> Jason Hall
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:37 AM
> To: Provo Linux Users Group Mailing List
> Subject: Re: SSH hank attempts bad?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Chris Carey wrote:
> > Let me apologise again for not snipping my response enough. It must
> > have caused your scrolling finger some pain to motivate you to make
> > personal attack on me.
> Nah, doesn't take much at all, especially when it comes to list
> - --
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> Don't fear the penguin.
More information about the PLUG