[net] user connction to sshd

Stuart Jansen sjansen at buscaluz.org
Sat Jul 9 23:35:06 MDT 2005

On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 23:05 -0600, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> Anyway, the bottom line is that you're not seeing anything out of the 
> ordinary, and you should expect it to continue.  Just follow some 
> common-sense strategies to secure the box, and you'll be fine.

Where common-sense == use something more recent than RH8. SSH is a great
piece of software written by some very paranoid people. But IIRC, 8 is
old enough that even SSH has known security vulnerabilities. (And I
don't mean switching to RH9 or even FC2.)

/me cues the flood of distro X is better because of Y messages

Stuart Jansen                   e-mail/jabber: sjansen at buscaluz.org

"XML is like violence: if it doesn't solve your problem, you aren't
using enough of it." - Chris Maden

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20050709/3efa215d/attachment-0001.bin 

More information about the PLUG mailing list