For the record...

Hans Fugal hans at
Sun Feb 13 22:45:53 MST 2005

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 at 18:56 -0700, Dave Smith wrote:
> Yes, comparing a 5-year old release to a 5-week old one is not fair in 
> my view.

I was in a hurry or I would have added that caveat. I had thought of it.
And yes, it is to be expected. However, the very fact that there _is_ a
5-week old release of something like ubuntu is something to be proud of.
Many people still slap on windows 2000, although I agree XP is more
common nowdays. 

_However_, this laptop is older. It came with Windows 98, and so Windows
2000 was newer than the laptop or at least contemporary. I wouldn't
dream of XP on it because XP would be too slow.  So when the newer
release doesn't run on the hardware because it's too bloated and the
older release has no excuse for lacking hardware support, I don't think
we need to cut too much slack.

In any case, my point was that we are now at least to the point windows
was 5 years ago. 5 years ago many people would have laughed at the very

 .O.  Hans Fugal            | De gustibus non disputandum est.
 ..O | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg
 OOO                        | WindowMaker, gaim, UTF-8, RISC, JS Bach
GnuPG Fingerprint: 6940 87C5 6610 567F 1E95  CB5E FC98 E8CD E0AA D460
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 

More information about the PLUG mailing list