Hypervisors and you!
ddavidegli at gmail.com
Sat Mar 23 01:02:47 MDT 2013
*I had a thought on this just a bit ago. Just out of curosity, how would
something like work for virtualizing a different architecture? For example,
could I emulate a PC on an older PPC Mac running say an older version of
Yellow Dog Linux? Or could I emulate an x86 chip on an ARM? Or maybe the
other way around, emulating an ARM on an x86 chip?*
*I was just wondering. :)*
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:12:15AM -0600, Tod Hansmann wrote:
> > What's your favorite VM Server thingamajig? Why? What else might you
> > recommend? How do you manage it?
> Lots of replies in the thread, and I haven't read them all, so apologies if
> this has already been mentioned.
> KVM is solid for virtual machines if you wish to run the Linux kernel. But,
> if you need high density and maximum performance, you should be looking at
> containers rather than VMs. I would personally recommend LXC if using
> Debian/Ubuntu with cgroups, or OpenVZ if on the RH-side of things.
> In my testing and troubleshooting, I can easily get twice the density AND
> twice the performance using containers over VMs. The big drawback, of
> course, is sticking to Linux kernels, and losing the ability to virtualize
> non-Linux kernel, such as Windows. However, you can run both a container
> and VM hypervisor on one box, if you need that homogeny.
> . o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
> . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o
> o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
> PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> Don't fear the penguin.
More information about the PLUG