Defining Libertarianism (was Defining Terrorism)
S. Dale Morrey
sdalemorrey at gmail.com
Thu Jun 27 06:35:31 MDT 2013
No the point was pretty clear, what was missed was the mirth in my post.
Still from everything I've seen I would definitely say that the USA is a
state sponsor of terrorism in the same vein as Cuba, North Korea & Iran,
which are all called as such by our own government. If you can find a
legitimate reason for any of those countries to be labelled as such that
wasn't directly a result of our own decision to back a dog in a fight that
wasn't ours I'll publicly retract.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Daniel C. <dcrookston at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:28 AM, S. Dale Morrey <sdalemorrey at gmail.com>
> > We've declared (well at least I have, and since I saw no disagreement I
> > think we all concur) that the US government is a state sponsor of
> I guess the point of my "defining terrorism" thread was missed. The
> US government is not a state sponsor of terrorism. It is certainly
> not a shining example of morality, but it's not sponsoring terrorism
> either. Anyone who thinks it is has an overly broad definition of
> terror, or (worse) has been listening to Chomsky.
> PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> Don't fear the penguin.
More information about the PLUG