dcrookston at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 13:13:28 MDT 2013
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Nathan England <nathan at nmecs.com> wrote:
> What I like best about this definition is because it makes it clear the U.S.
> government is actively engaging in terrorism. Along with the democrats and
> republicans, minorities, even the janitors at Walmart!
It is a pretty useless definition. What counts as terror? If you
tell a country's leaders that you're going to invade their country if
they don't stop doing X, is that terrorism? What if X is genocide?
What about a trade embargo - does that constitute terror?
More information about the PLUG