Did Ed Snowden do the right thing?
charlescurley at charlescurley.com
Mon Jun 10 14:38:57 MDT 2013
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:47:22 -0700
Nathan England <nathan at nmecs.com> wrote:
> Science is in large part unproven theories,
Um, yeah. And this is perfectly reasonable. The job of science is not
to prove theories, but to disprove them.
> just as the Bible is
> only a book with little physical evidence it is right.
I have no problem with someone *believing* the bible. I do have a
problem with trying to use it in scientific endeavors because most
people who do so use it in the informal fallacy called the argument
Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards
and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email
Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
More information about the PLUG