Quantum teleportation, FTL, and causality; was Re: Cat 5 extended run?
dfussell at byu.edu
Wed Apr 3 18:20:30 MDT 2013
On 03/17/2013 10:24 AM, Levi Pearson wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Nicholas Leippe<nick at leippe.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Levi Pearson<levipearson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Seriously, pi is 4? Do you understand that if this guy was actually right, we wouldn't be able to build a proper bicycle, much less a computer or a nuclear reactor.
>> He only derives pi as 4 for kinematic scenarios, not static.
> No, he doesn't. That essay is just a pile of misguided and faulty reasoning couched in surprisingly well-written prose. Pi is never 4, even in kinematic But not everything that looks on the surface like a valid mathematical derivation actually is.
Wait, I thought pi was redefined to 3.2 by the Indiana house of
More information about the PLUG