slightly OT, need some electronic circuit help
shane at hathawaymix.org
Mon Oct 8 15:18:52 MDT 2012
On 10/08/2012 02:03 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 01:30 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> The large current requirement (10A) and the need for a middle position
>> make the circuit interesting and difficult to achieve using low cost
>> analog components. An analog H bridge would work well if you only
>> needed 2 positions. You can't dump that much current through an
>> ordinary op amp. (Audio amplifiers use big, expensive op amps that
>> easily surpass the cost of an Arduino.) PWM is the usual solution for
>> handling that much current.
>> However, can you achieve the middle position using a simple mechanical
>> spring? That would allow you to use a very simple H bridge.
>> It would help a lot to understand the application better. What kind of
>> resting position do you want? When the power is lost, do you want it to
>> revert somewhere, or hold its position firmly/loosely?
> Okay, so here's what I have. I have a linear actuator, which is
> essentially a screw driven by a motor. And the actuator has a built-in
> potentiometer to give you position. The motor uses very little or lots
> of amps depending on the load. I won't be having much load, so the amp
> draw is very low, like under 1 amp at 12 VDC, most likely. The
> actuator, being a screw, cannot move when power is not on. So I don't
> need to hold it actively. It is also very slow (compared to a servo),
> so PWM is not required. Full on voltage or no voltage is sufficient.
> As I said before, I don't need super-accurate positioning, so I don't
> need the actuator to seek back and forth around the target point. When
> it gets there it can just stop, even if it's too far or too close by a
> small amount.
> This actuator is controlling a hydraulic valve assembly so it only needs
> three positions: extended, middle, and retracted. It will always be in
> one of these positions; there's no resting position.
> Nick's idea of using limit switches is a good idea. I am confident a
> simple circuit can do it all without that kind of extra mechanical stuff
> Really I'm not worried about amp draw because I can use the result of
> the op amps to drive a relay to switch the higher amps if I need to.
Ok, it seems like you want 2 op-amps wired as comparators. One op amp
decides whether to move the motor forward, the other decides whether to
move it backward. (You can get multiple op-amps on a chip, so this
doesn't increase the parts count.) You'll have to calibrate the circuit
so that the op amps don't activate simultaneously.
To keep things simple, let's say each op amp drives a DPST (or DPDT)
relay. That solves your voltage issue: it isolates the control circuit
from the motors, so you can apply reverse voltage to the motors. You
can also use a voltage regulator in case the supply is too noisy.
Each op amp should perform a slightly different comparison. When you
want the middle position, the op amp that controls forward movement
should compare the motor sense voltage with a voltage slightly lower
than the control voltage, while the other op amp compares the motor
sense voltage with a voltage slightly higher than the control voltage.
You can adjust the voltages using resistor-based voltage dividers.
Does that make sense? The comparator circuit on this page is a good
More information about the PLUG