GPL worldview WAS Re: Rchard Stallman vs Darl McBride
richard-lists at esplins.org
Wed Jul 21 08:38:26 MDT 2010
IBM did invest in Unix, but under a proprietary license, and called it AIX.
Lost of companies have invested in BSD Unix, but compared to Linux, few have contributed back.
On Wednesday, July 21, 2010 07:29:53 Michael Torrie <torriem at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/21/2010 05:18 AM, justin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 20, 2010, Michael Torrie <torriem at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The GPL levels the playing field. IBM's contributions can't be used
> >> against them, as they could be with a BSD license. Linux gets better
> >> for everyone.
> > I'm not sure I follow. How could IBM's contributions be used against
> > them under a BSD license?
> Simply put, anything IBM did with a BSD project (and where their code
> was released under the BSD), could be used in a closed, proprietary way
> in a product that competes with IBM. Whereas with the GPL, IBM's
> contributions cannot be closed. If a company chooses to make a superior
> product based on IBM's contributions under the GPL, IBM is free to
> incorporate their changes as well (it's only fair after all). Level
> playing field. IBM works with many open source licenses, but I believe
> that the GPL is one of the reasons IBM chose (at one time anyway) to
> invest so heavily in Linux. I do not believe IBM would have invested in
> the same way in BSD Unix.
More information about the PLUG