SCO rises from the dead (again)
charlescurley at charlescurley.com
Fri Jul 9 11:16:43 MDT 2010
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:34:16 -0600
Merrill Oveson <moveson at gmail.com> wrote:
> How can they afford this? Are even producing a nickel of revenue?
> In my mind, the lawyers for SCO are providing bad legal advice if they
> are advising their client to continue.
> (Of course, the lawyers have a vested interest...)
One of the comments indicated that the lawyers are on a fixed fee
basis, so it costs SCO *nothing* (or very little) for them to continue.
If so, then the lawyers and SCO deserve each other. Unfortunately the
other parties do not.
Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards
and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email
Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
More information about the PLUG