[OT] [RANT] Gitting Backwards
coolaj86 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 20 14:19:10 MST 2010
If by "most of the world" you mean archiac businesses that are still using
SourceSave, then yes.
If by "most of the world" you mean developers who pick of their own free
will and choosing....
what's that big popular open source site again?
the one that replaced sourceforge and makes google code hardly worth
the one that many people have started using in place of a resume
can anybody help me out here? I can't see to remember...
anyway, I wonder what scm they use...
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Charles Curley <
charlescurley at charlescurley.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:59:41 -0700
> Von Fugal <von at fugal.net> wrote:
> > Well, technically (as per the instruction in the thread) you're not
> > creating a branch, though you could do that. What you end up with when
> > checking out by a hash code is going "headless", though sometimes, yes
> > it is called a headless branch.
> <rant>This is one reason I have come to hate git. If the user isn't
> creating a branch, then don't use the branch creation syntax to do it.
> Use the branch creation syntax, and people who aren't git gurus (most
> of the world) will make the forgivable mistake of thinking they've
> created a branch. git has become the Kabbalah of CVSs.</rant>
> Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards
> and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email
> http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email
> Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
> PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> Don't fear the penguin.
More information about the PLUG