steve at bluehost.com
Thu Oct 23 11:46:46 MDT 2008
Brian Beardall wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 07:52 -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:58:15PM -0600, Dr. Scott S. Jones wrote:
>>> What does one use to wipe a drive, what application? I have a few that I
>>> need to clean up...and overwrite, to protect patient data.
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda
>> Want to contest that the above command securely deletes data? See the
>> following link, then get back to me: http://16systems.com/zero/index.html
> The award money isn't even worth it. The best way would be to have the
> FBI or CIA want the data off the disk. They'll spend what ever it takes
> to invent the technology to get the data off. After all those two
> probably have the best data recovery services this planet has to offer.
> I'm not suggesting to do anything illegal to test their services though.
> Brian Beardall
I agree, the $500 is not worth the effort for these companies, all of
which will charge at least that for a Norton undelete level of
recovery. The drive itself is only designed to read the most powerful
magnetic impression, not the lower level remains of old data. A truly
high end firm, like the CIA or FBI would remove the platter from the
drive housing and use special equipment to read the differences under
those zeroes. The challenge is unrealistic, and in the end they will
claim they proved themselves right without any reality being involved.
This goes to the basic question, "What is your data worth to someone else?"
if it is your workstation hard drive at home, with your personal email
and checking account data, all zeroes are more then sufficient, since
there are easier ways to get that data that low level recovery. If it
is corporate secrets worth millions to your company, then a full burn
with a physical nail through the platter would be very good security.
If the drive had government secrets, possibly worth billions, then
incinerate the drives.
Do the effort required to secure the data to the level of it's potential
value to someone else, whether it is a hard drive, Sally Secretary, or
any type of security.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3254 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20081023/729ce72e/attachment.bin
More information about the PLUG