Job: Sr. Linux Engineer (FamilySearch.org)

Jacob Fugal lukfugl at gmail.com
Mon Nov 24 11:52:44 MST 2008


On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Nicholas Leippe <nick at leippe.com> wrote:
> On Monday 24 November 2008 11:37:13 am Hans Fugal wrote:
>> Nicholas Leippe wrote:
>> > On Monday 24 November 2008 11:31:49 am Bryan Sant wrote:
>> >>  Must be a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints,
>> >> currently worthy of a temple recommend
>> >
>> > Is that requirement even legal?
>>
>> It's a common requirement for almost all employment at the church, so I
>> would imagine that's been well-established.
>
> Well, I can see an obvious lack of motivation for non-lds to work for the lds
> church for most positions, thus it's probably rarely/perhaps never questioned.
> But for a technology position, it is employment, and I can see where there
> could be demand to fill it from outside the church...
> Just because they have gotten away with it, doesn't make it legal if it isn't.
> So, back to my question, does anyone actually know for a fact?

See: Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter Day Saints v. Amos (1987)[1]

Jacob Fugal

[1] http://religiousfreedom.lib.virginia.edu/court/latt_v_amos.html



More information about the PLUG mailing list