[OT] voting survey
Von Fugal
von at fugal.net
Mon Mar 24 10:20:10 MDT 2008
<quote name="Levi Pearson" date="Fri, 21 Mar 2008 at 14:53 -0600">
> I agree with the goal of the above system, but it does have a flaw
> with respect to another important property of a voting system. It
> should be impossible to definitively associate a person with the
> particular votes they cast after they leave the voting booth. This
> prevents coerced voting and vote selling, since it becomes impossible
> to verify that the votes were cast as the voter claims.
I feel kinda silly, but I've never heard or thought of the vote selling
side of it. I merely focused on the coercion side, it's impossible for
others to know what you voted. Indeed, it's also important that you
cannot verify who you voted for after the fact. Although as you state
below, it should be possible to verify that it wasn't changed!
> I believe that the above property can be combined with assurance that
> your vote is tallied without tampering, and I think I've read a paper
> on a system that provides a method, but I don't recall the details.
Thanks Levi for that thoughtful and informative post.
Von Fugal
--
Freedom is Popular
http://www.ronpaul2008.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20080324/f4a9d921/attachment.pgp
More information about the PLUG
mailing list