[OT] Mailing Lists: Good for argument, bad for discussion
shane at hathawaymix.org
Sun Jun 29 12:14:30 MDT 2008
Dave Smith wrote:
> I think this phenomenon happens because it's easy in an email to trim
> away things you don't want to respond to, and focus only on the part of
> the email that you disagree with. It's easy to believe that someone
> disagrees with you 100% because they chose to respond to the 1% of what
> you said that they disagreed with, even if that 1% was totally
> tangential to your main point (which the responder may *did* agree with,
> but you'd never know). I'm not sure if I like or dislike this because
> frankly, it'd be a boring list if everyone just responded with "me too".
> However, I do think it encourages argument and nit picking rather than
> good old-fashioned discussion.
> What are your thoughts?
This is a key difference between blogs and mailing lists. When blogs
first started appearing on the net, I thought they were hardly different
from email. Only when I started my own blog did I see the difference:
people stayed on topic in comment threads. I think this is because
there is always has editorial control. There is also a limit to the
editorial control because too much exercise of power drives readers away.
OTOH, sometimes I just need friends, help, an opportunity to help, or a
distraction, so I go to mailing lists. :-)
More information about the PLUG