OT - I don't _hate_ McMansions
levi at cold.org
Thu Jun 26 11:32:48 MDT 2008
"Bryan Sant" <bryan.sant at gmail.com> writes:
> I'm not aware of a pure data point to examine, however, whichever
> society follows closest to laissez-faire prospers the most. History
> is pretty clear on this. Consider the following:
> Milton Friedman - Greed
This one doesn't say anything about 'follows closest to
laissez-faire', it simply says that free markets create prosperity.
I'm certainly not arguing against that.
> Liberals and the fall of Detroit
Newt Gingrich blames the fall of Detroit on Liberals. I'm sure the
Liberals disagree. There's not enough content in the 4 minute clip
for me to make a judgement, but I'm sure things are more complex than
the picture he's painting here. Mostly fluff.
> Tax Rates and Job Creation
Hmm, more Gingrich. Yes, low taxes and low business regulation draw
business, that's pretty clear. Fluff.
> Leftist Views
Could you source someone else please? Geez. Yes, working is how you
make money and reduce poverty. More fluff.
> Friedman on Limited Government (long, 29 min)
Haven't got time to watch this. Why don't you reference some *text*
instead of talking heads?
So, how about what happens when there are absolutely no government
regulations on how business is conducted? You get child labor, abuse
of employees, rampant pollution, unsafe working conditions, and all
sorts of other problems. Capitalism doesn't really care about these
things, because it means that (at least in the short term) profits go
Clearly, there's a balance to be struck between free market forces and
government regulation. If you don't agree with that premise, I don't
know what to tell you.
More information about the PLUG