OT: HHO (Browns Gas) Conversion For Your Car

Alex Esplin alex.esplin at gmail.com
Wed Jun 11 23:55:00 MDT 2008


On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Levi Pearson <levi at cold.org> wrote:

snip

> piston and/or cylinder apart or bending the rods.  High-compression
> gas engines are more efficient, but they also require high-octane fuel
> to avoid pre-detonation.
>
> Turbocharging effectively increases the compression ratio, making
> pre-detonation even more likely.  Thus, timing has to be pulled and
> more fuel added as boost increases beyond atmospheric pressure, which
> dramatically reduces efficiency and power below what optimum spark
> timing and fuel mixture would bring.  This is why turbocharged gas
> engines can be tuned to much higher performance on race gas than pump
> gas.

This is why all decent engine-management systems advance the timing of
your ignition cycle when the turbo is making boost.  Obviously there's
a limit to how far you can advance your timing, but in order to be
"safer than sorry", many production, stock engines actually fire
slightly after top-dead-center.  Advancing the timing as close as you
can to top-dead-center slightly mitigates the problem.

Timing advancement is _not_ a substitute for effective octane level.
It merely helps a little.  And you are correct, in that a turbo only
increases efficiency when it is producing boost and the amount of fuel
stays constant.  Which is why my Passat got better mileage at 90+ mph
(turbo was making boost but the valve timing was still in "cruising"
mode) than at lower speeds.  The combination of slight boost + slight
timing advancement with (nearly)constant fuel consumption made it more
efficient.  That was one of the things I hated about that car.
Because the powerband vs. boost-production curves weren't very well
matched it got _horrible_ mileage in-town (usually below 20).

Well, brethren, I believe we have beat this horse well beyond death
and are bordering on the glue phase.

-- 
Alex Esplin



More information about the PLUG mailing list