OT - Gas to hit 4.00
santiago at mr-r.net
Wed Jun 11 14:12:13 MDT 2008
On Jun 11, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Kimball Larsen wrote:
> Getting back to what Grant mentioned, I run into a moral dilemma -
> and it's one that has only recently surfaced for me: Where do we
> draw the line? At what point *should* the government step in and
> assist people in distress? It seems that Democrats tend to be in
> the "anytime you get a boo-boo, the government will come kiss it
> better for you" camp, while today's republicans seem to be ...
> uhm.... I'm not sure anymore. Hmm.
I guess I should also clarify the context of my remarks. I am not
saying the government should step in to help out with gas prices (but
I would really like them to help "control the things they can control"
by doing what they can to shore up the dollar and reduce the national
debt). I was merely pointing out that there do exist situations that
are beyond our direct control, and those can sometimes cause financial
hardship and even ruin, despite the most carefully laid plans. I was
also pointing out that it is presumptuous to think that most of *us*
(meaning those on this list) know much about the "average American"
either collectively or individually.
I also believe that we all *should* do the things that Dave and
Kimball have mentioned. Don't buy more house or car than you can
afford, live within your means, and save as much money as you can. If
you are in debt (esp. credit card debt), stop accumulating debt and
start paying it off, and get it paid off as soon as is financially
feasible. For some people, some of the these things are much easier
to say than to do.
Lastly, I am just disgusted with gas/oil prices in general, and I am
actively looking to alternative energy sources to power my vehicles.
I truly believe our long-term economic viability is tied to becoming
less dependent on oil (foreign or otherwise) and more dependent on
renewable forms of energy.
More information about the PLUG