Interesting Language Rant
bryan.sant at gmail.com
Tue Jan 8 10:36:54 MST 2008
On Jan 8, 2008 9:58 AM, <blr at robertsr.us> wrote:
> Even though he is an Ada bigot, I have to agree somewhat. Java, Python,
> Perl, Ruby, etc. probably shouldn't be the core of a curriculum because
> they're too high-level. But if you learn C and assembly, I don't see any
> reason not to use them.
> Whatta y'all think?
For as much of a Java bigot as I am, I agree that Java (or any
high-level language) shouldn't be the core of a curriculum. I started
in C and wrote a lot of useful software with it. Starting with a
low-level language will give a person a better base, and allow them to
appreciate higher level languages.
I don't think that C#/Java/Python/Perl would be bad 101 class
languages. But you'd better introduce students to C and ASM shortly
More information about the PLUG