Interesting Language Rant
smorrey at gmail.com
Tue Jan 8 10:15:43 MST 2008
What would be the practical implications of learning a language such as Ada?
I've wanted to learn some of these more obscure languages for well
over a decade, but you'ld be hard pressed to a find a book that
teaches application development in Lisp, Ada, COBOL, Fortran, or
pretty much any language which predates ANSI C.
I would LOVE to learn these languages, but alas the only one I've had
any success with is LISP and thats only because AutoCAD still uses it
and there were a ton of example applications to learn from, even then
though they were limited to the AutoCAD dialect of LISP which I
understand isn't really LISP either. Even with that said, I am still
a complete noob with LISP.
On Jan 8, 2008 10:09 AM, Levi Pearson <levi at cold.org> wrote:
> You'll notice if you read carefully that he says pretty much the same
> thing you do; students should learn about high-level languages, but
> not at the expense of low-level knowledge and formal methods.
> Although he's clearly a fan of Ada, I don't think he came off as a
> bigot. Frankly, I'd like to see more of Ada in the schools and
> marketplace. It's got an interesting and powerful type system,
> provides all sorts of interesting low-level stuff for embedded and
> real-time systems, and has some built-in concurrency primitives.
> On Jan 8, 2008 9:58 AM, <blr at robertsr.us> wrote:
> > http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/CrossTalk/2008/01/0801DewarSchonberg.html
> > I thought it was interesting for a couple of reasons. First, I remember
> > hearing back in the '80s that object-oriented and component programming
> > were going to make programming more like designing circuits with IC's. I
> > think I remember a CACM with legos on the cover. I guess we're finally
> > there, maybe.
> > Second, all the pitfalls listed for java are all the things about java
> > that scripting language bigots claim Java doesn't do (admittedly some
> > scripting languages do better in some cases). So they all apply, maybe
> > even more so, to Python, Perl, Ruby, C#, etc.
> > Even though he is an Ada bigot, I have to agree somewhat. Java, Python,
> > Perl, Ruby, etc. probably shouldn't be the core of a curriculum because
> > they're too high-level. But if you learn C and assembly, I don't see any
> > reason not to use them.
> > Whatta y'all think?
> > Barry Roberts
> > /*
> > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> > Don't fear the penguin.
> > */
> PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> Don't fear the penguin.
More information about the PLUG