VI vs Emacs.NET?

Steve smorrey at gmail.com
Tue Jan 1 11:11:35 MST 2008


If they built the next version of Windows on Emacs, it would probably
be a heck of a lot more stable.
After all isn't Emacs, the OS of text editors?

On Jan 1, 2008 1:49 AM, Levi Pearson <levi at cold.org> wrote:
> Michael Torrie <torriem at chem.byu.edu> writes:
>
> > Ooh, but does it mean we're going to see Lisp.NET?
> >
>
> Well, as other people pointed out, there are already some
> kind-of-lispy languages that target the CLR, including Lisp# and
> dotlisp.  I don't think they'll have anything to do with this
> emacs-like thing, though.  I also doubt it will be very much like
> emacs.
>
>
>                 --Levi
>
> /*
> PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> Don't fear the penguin.
> */
>



More information about the PLUG mailing list