[OT] Re: HB 139 Meeting Today ?
kemotaha at gmail.com
Thu Feb 7 09:53:10 MST 2008
On Feb 7, 2008 9:35 AM, Thad Van Ry <thad at linuxnetadmin.com> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2008 9:27 AM, Nathan Blackham <kemotaha at gmail.com> wrote:
> > So If I put up a page that they have to agree to that says, If you are a
> > minor you can use it. And they have to click ok, does that count as
> > restricting access?
> Why do people seem so reluctant to read the bill? It can be found here:
> The bill states the ways that age can be verified, currently it states
> only viewing government issued ID or asking for credit card
> The bill is not that hard to understand and it's only 76 lines of
> text. I recommend everyone read it before commenting on this thread.
Wow, after reading it, I see that it is a horribly written bill. The
definition of restricting access still makes my question valid though. The
bill says you either have to ascertain the age or restrict access (Sec.
220.127.116.11). But I guess it isn't relevant unless the bill gets passed.
More information about the PLUG