(UTOPIA) Tax Alert : Stop 150% tax pledge increase
Jonathan Duncan
jonathan at bluesunhosting.com
Tue Apr 15 11:25:40 MDT 2008
For anyone that does not get these messages, I thought it would be
interesting to get the opinions of the group. I am still waiting
after several years for UTOPIA to pull into my neighborhood. My
opinion is, pull the plug and sell the existing service off to a
private company. I will not support a raise in tax for UTOPIA.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "The Utah Taxpayers Association" <taxwatch at utahtaxpayers.org>
> Date: 14 April 2008 11:21:08 MDT
> Subject: Tax Alert : Stop 150% tax pledge increase
>
> Experiment with socialized telecom has failed, yet member cities are
> considering 150% increase in their tax pledges.
>
> UTOPIA: Utah’s $504 million boondoggle
> Utah’s experiment in socialized telecom has failed. After 4 years,
> operating revenues are 3% of projections and like the subprime
> mortgage fiasco, UTOPIA wants City Councils to keep them afloat on
> the taxpayers’ credit card by increasing their debt by 150% and
> extending their payments to 33 years.
>
> The Utah Open Infrastructure Association (UTOPIA) began constructing
> its network in 2004. Promising a “future-proof” fiber-optic network
> offering super-high speed internet, the UTOPIA propagandists
> promised city council members “ubiquitous” coverage. In return, the
> city councils agreed to collectively guarantee hundreds of millions
> of dollars in UTOPIA bonds with sales tax revenues normally used for
> essential services like police and fire protection. (A clearer
> example of Marx’s infamous dictum, “From each according to his
> ability, to each according to his need,” couldn’t be found.)
>
>
> Your Utah Taxpayers Association urged Utah cities not to join
> UTOPIA. We told them that cities shouldn’t compete with the private
> sector, that they shouldn’t wager millions of taxpayer dollars in a
> risky scheme.
>
>
> We succeeded in keeping most Utah cities out, but 11 joined, and
> they pledged up to $202 million in sales taxes to pay off UTOPIA’s
> bonds. Of course, no one ever thought that might be necessary.
> Today, things look a little different.
>
>
> UTOPIA’s next bond payment is due in just weeks, and they don’t have
> the money. Instead, they want member cities to adopt a new pledge
> agreement that increases each city’s annual payment, and stretches
> the pay-off time from 20 to 33 years. These changes increase
> taxpayer exposure from $202 million to $504 million. Call the City
> Council members in these cities, and tell them “No!” Tell them you
> have better things to do with the $504 million subsidy UTOPIA wants.
>
>
> HOW MUCH WILL UTOPIA’S NEW AGREEMENT COST?
> UTOPIA is asking for a massive 150% increase in sales tax pledges.
> If UTOPIA fails to meet their bond obligations, taxpayers could end
> up paying up to $504 million.
>
>
>
> SHOULD YOUR GRANDCHILDREN PAY FOR UTOPIA’S MESS?
> Unfortunately these city councils imagined that they’d do a
> municipal telecom project better with taxpayer dollars than the
> private sector with private investment. After all, the capital
> markets let them repay this debt over first 20, and now 33 years.
> And the capital markets let them put 4 years of payments on their
> credit card. If the private sector is so good at this, why do the
> capital markets require them to repay their debt in just 5 years?
>
> The problem with that analysis is that capital markets don’t care
> whether a city can run a telecom system. To repay its debts, UTOPIA
> and other municipal providers can simply increase taxes. For private
> providers to repay their debts, they have to actually succeed, and
> make enough money to cover their debt service, interest payments and
> operating costs.
>
>
> The question these City Councils have to ask is, do they really want
> their grandchildren and great grand children to pay for UTOPIA’s
> mess? With a 33 year term, that’s exactly what will happen.
>
>
> WHY HAS UTOPIA FAILED TO MEET ANY OF ITS FINANCIAL GOALS?
>
> As the next chart shows, UTOPIA painted a very rosy picture about
> their operating revenue. The reality has been very different.
>
>
>
>
> The huge gap between their projected and actual revenues is hardly
> surprising, when you look at how many customers UTOPIA thought would
> buy their service and how many actually did, and at how much the
> average customer would pay for UTOPIA.
>
>
>
>
>
> Projected
>
>
>
> Minimum
>
>
>
> Actual
>
>
>
> Take Rate
>
>
>
> 55%
>
>
>
> 20%
>
>
>
> 17%
>
>
>
> Average Revenue per User
>
>
>
> $58
>
>
>
> n/a
>
>
>
> $28
>
>
>
> Difficult as it may be to believe, UTOPIA actually expected they
> would grab more than half the market. But to be conservative, they
> noted that a take rate of just 20% would allow them to pay their
> bills. Just 17% have actually signed up. And instead of paying an
> average of $58/month, they are paying less than half that, just $28/
> month. In other words, the average customer isn’t buying anywhere
> near as many services as UTOPIA expected them to.
>
>
> HOW WELL DO UTOPIA CITIES UNDERSTAND THE TELECOM INDUSTRY?
> How could UTOPIA’s board and management have been so wrong about
> these basic financial projections? They don’t know the telecom
> industry. Their experience is in building and maintaining parks,
> sewers and roads. Those are critical infrastructure systems, but
> vastly different from the highly competitive telecom industry.
>
> In light of their failure, at least one UTOPIA city is finally
> willing to admit that they don’t understand the industry.
> Centerville Mayor Ron Russell recently told the Davis County
> Clipper, “I don’t think we have the expertise to do
> telecommunications analysis in-house.” That’s a rather astounding
> statement: Centerville is the only UTOPIA city with a city council
> member who works in the telecom industry.
>
>
> STOP UTOPIA NOW
> Given the utopian promises of “ubiquitous” build out, revenues
> streaming into the city coffers from new economic development, and
> the 2-year delay in making its first bond payment, UTOPIA and
> backers never believed the day of reckoning would come. But come it
> has.
>
> UTOPIA’s sheer cheek is utterly astounding. They have failed to
> achieve a single goal, but now they want a massive 150% increase in
> sales tax pledges. Now is the time for the 11 city councils to stand
> up and say NO! UTOPIA was a bad idea to begin with, but the new
> pledge agreement throws good money after bad. Instead of using the
> taxpayers’ credit card to pay for UTOPIA’s mortgage, the Mayors and
> City Councils in these cities should cut their losses by paying
> their bills, and salvaging what value they can by selling the
> network to private providers.
>
>
> IF YOU LIVE IN A UTOPIA CITY, CALL YOUR MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, AND
> TELL THEM TO VOTE “NO!” ON THE NEW PLEDGE AGREEMENT.
> You can find the email addresses of the Mayors and city councils in
> UTOPIA cities on our website, www.utahtaxpayers.org.
>
> Utah Taxpayers Association
> 1578 West 1700 South, #201
> Salt Lake City, Utah 8410
>
> 801-972-8814 -- www.utahtaxpayers.org -- utahtaxpayer.blogspot.com
Regards,
Jonathan
More information about the PLUG
mailing list