Setting up Rails for Virtual Hosting?
kurt.griffiths at gmail.com
Wed Apr 23 11:16:13 MDT 2008
One more note - even if you use Passenger + Apache (because it *is* lovely)
for the rails app, you will still see significant performance benefits by
serving your static content (images, css, cached items) via Nginx.
On 4/23/08, Kurt Griffiths <kurt.griffiths at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would highly recommend that you try Nginx. It is significantly faster
> than the other common servers we have tested at Sebo, both as a proxy and
> for serving static content directly.
> On 4/23/08, Steve Morrey <lists at itconsultingplus.com> wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Carl Youngblood <carl at youngbloods.org>
> > wrote:
> > Those instructions are quite old. I would not recommend using
> > lighttpd. Until recently, the setup of choice was to use some kind of
> > software-based load balancer (such as mod_proxy_balancer) in front of
> > a few mongrel instances, but now there is an easier way. There is a
> > new apache module called passenger that is very easy to set up:
> > http://www.modrails.com/
> > </SNIP>
> > Holy mother of pearl!
> > Thats awesome Carl, thanks!
> > Sincerely,
> > Steve
> > /*
> > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> > Don't fear the penguin.
> > */
More information about the PLUG