64 bit Linux, flash, and firefox ETA?

[Wade Preston Shearer]

>>> Microsoft and Adobe aren't not programs, so they are neither
>>> open-source nor closed-source.
>>
>> Cows are not ducks and therefore do not quack.
>
> This is also true, but doesn't contradict anything I said.  My
> statement (at least if you ignore the typo) refutes your statement
> that Microsoft is closed-source.  C'mon now; are you arguing me
> because you hate Microsoft or because you really don't think
> Silverlight will be a potentially reasonable alternative in the
> future?  If the latter, you might try making some substantive points
> in your argument's favor.

I replied with the cow/duck comment because I couldn't believe you  
thought (or at least implied that you thought) that I was referring to  
corporations as closed or open-source instead of their products and/or  
attitudes towards software licensing.

In regards to Silverlight, I do not have any evidence for or against  
besides Microsoft's track record. I trust Adobe much more than I trust  
Microsoft and Novell.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2425 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20080421/64eb675b/attachment.bin