Best Computer Science School in Utah

Steve smorrey at gmail.com
Wed Sep 26 22:43:43 MDT 2007


No but I do enjoy playing devils advocate sometimes.

So to continue the thought experiment...

All numbers are arbitrary symbols we apply to represent quantity.
Therefore if we discard convention and say instead that 2 is really a
symbol meaning two and one half units of a given quantity then 2 + 2
does in fact equal 5.

I mean if we can say that A = 10, B = 11 and etc, one should certainly
be able to say that 2 = two and one half units.

Oh hello Mr. Wells!  :)

Sorry couldn't resist

On 9/26/07, Levi Pearson <levi at cold.org> wrote:
> Steve <smorrey at gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > Same thing with computing.
> > How much of computing science is going to become irrelevant should
> > quantum computing take off?  How many new laws are waiting to be
> > discovered?
>
> I think you just completely missed the part where we actually
> understand what's computable.  Yes, this even applies to quantum
> computers.  We have a pretty good idea of what they can do, too, and
> it's not magic.
>
> There are probably new laws to be discovered in computing, and we
> still haven't proved whether P = NP or not, but when we prove
> something in computer science, it's proven.  I don't know how I can be
> any more clear than that.
>
> Next you'll be telling me that it's not completely impossible for 2 +
> 2 to equal 5.
>
>                 --Levi
>
>
> /*
> PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> Don't fear the penguin.
> */
>



More information about the PLUG mailing list