Best Computer Science School in Utah
charlescurley at charlescurley.com
Wed Sep 26 11:33:39 MDT 2007
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:26:02AM -0600, Levi Pearson wrote:
> Paul Seamons <paul at seamons.com> writes:
> Computer scientists are actually pretty picky about the words they use
> to describe the difficulty of problems. You will never find a non-CS
> person, or anyone else, solving an problem deemed impossible by CS
> theory, because such problems are not computable. If it looks like
> they did, then they only thought they solved the problem. They either
> solved something else, or the solutions are wrong.
> Your argument seems to me equivalent to saying that lack of training
> in physics gives you a better shot at designing physically impossible
> devices. Despite your words, no one is going to successfully build a
> perpetual motion machine, because such things are impossible.
Right. Now go find a short story by Issac Asimov titled "Not Final".
This reminds me of something Sir Arthur C. Clarke observed: that when
a distingushed scientist telly you something is possible he is almost
certainly correct. But when he tells you something is impossible, he
is almost certainly wrong.
Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards
and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email
Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20070926/38d950a5/attachment.bin
More information about the PLUG