itoa'd you so?
Michael L Torrie
torriem at chem.byu.edu
Wed Sep 19 16:37:47 MDT 2007
Bryan Sant wrote:
> This only supports a base of up to 16. Make me wonder what the limit
> is for the actual libc runtime's itoa implementation. We use a base
> 59 number in some software I use here at work. Why 59 and not 64?
> Because we've removed the vowels so it's impossible for swear words to
> be generated :-).
itoa is not a standard c library routine, as far as I can tell. It
exists in a non-standard way in some libc's, but it's certainly not
More information about the PLUG