C++ stylistic concerns?
dave at thesmithfam.org
Wed Mar 21 10:02:20 MDT 2007
Michael L Torrie wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 09:29 -0600, Steve wrote:
>> Ok sorry allow me to clarify.
>> wxWidgets was ruled out by the client in the contract wording.
>> When I asked why they said "We cannot re-license it", which is fine
>> they want a library that they can set the licensing terms on pretty
>> much soup to nuts.
> Umm, no one can do this for any license typically. The library doesn't
> belong to them.
The IBM public license allows it if memory serves. IANAL, but at my last
job, we re-released a library that was released to use under the IBM
public license under our own commercial license. The only requirement
was attribution to the original author. I seem to remember reading the
license to make sure of it, and feeling assured that that was indeed the
Strange, but true.
More information about the PLUG