SPF sucks
Steven Alligood
steve at bluehost.com
Thu Jun 28 09:51:15 MDT 2007
Before you can convincingly argue against SPF, you need to come up with
something that works better and is still as easy to implement.
-Steve
Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Michael L Torrie on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:12:36 MDT:
>
>
>> In my quest to implement a mixed Google Mail/Postfix mail solution for
>> my domain, I just came across a situation that shows how SPF really
>> really sucks and is fundamentally broken.
>>
>
> Here here! Finally another person convinced of the evilness of SPF! :-)
> Search google for some good discussion on the drawbacks and futility of
> using SPF.
>
>
>> Of course, since many people have chosen to use it, I have to now
>> figure out a workaround.
>>
>
> I for one will continue to argue against SPF.
>
> Andy
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20070628/8d5e8956/smime-0001.bin
More information about the PLUG
mailing list