SPF sucks

Steven Alligood steve at bluehost.com
Thu Jun 28 09:51:15 MDT 2007


Before you can convincingly argue against SPF, you need to come up with 
something that works better and is still as easy to implement.

-Steve

Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Michael L Torrie on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:12:36 MDT:
>
>   
>> In my quest to implement a mixed Google Mail/Postfix mail solution for
>> my domain,  I just came across  a situation that shows  how SPF really
>> really sucks and is fundamentally broken.
>>     
>
> Here here! Finally another person convinced  of the evilness of SPF! :-)
> Search google for some good discussion  on the drawbacks and futility of
> using SPF.
>
>   
>> Of course,  since many  people have chosen  to use it,  I have  to now
>> figure out a workaround.
>>     
>
> I for one will continue to argue against SPF.
>
> Andy
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20070628/8d5e8956/attachment.bin 


More information about the PLUG mailing list