SPF sucks

Stuart Jansen sjansen at buscaluz.org
Wed Jun 27 13:47:15 MDT 2007


On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:12 -0600, Michael L Torrie wrote:
> In my quest to implement a mixed Google Mail/Postfix mail solution for
> my domain, I just came across a situation that shows how SPF really
> really sucks and is fundamentally broken.

Nobody ever claimed SPF was a 100% solution... Although a few crack
smokers tried to make it a 100% solution by designing an insane header
rewriting solution. While you're falling in love with SPF, might as well
jump in with both feet.

-- 
Stuart Jansen              e-mail/jabber: sjansen at buscaluz.org
                           google talk:   stuart.jansen at gmail.com

"However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at 
the results." -- Winston Churchill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20070627/525b78f6/attachment.bin 


More information about the PLUG mailing list