hans at fugal.net
Mon Jul 30 08:11:41 MDT 2007
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 at 11:36 -0600, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Michael L Torrie on Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:04:34 MDT:
> > > Would you expect sendmail replacements (qmail, postfix, etc...) to
> > > be able to understand sendmail.cf? :-)
> > That's a fallacious comparison when it comes right down to it.
> How so? You are claiming that for djbdns to be a BIND replacement it
> must read BIND zone files. How is that different from claiming that for
> something to be a sendmail replacement (the most common MTA on the
> Internet) that it must understand sendmail.cf?
There is a difference. Nobody cares about the sendmail config files, in
fact everyone despises them. But all those sendmail replacements do all
the necessary things to drop in where sendmail was (with their own
config files), like /etc/aliases, the wacky sendmail binary with it's
myriad bizarre switches, etc. They emulate sendmail in the ways that
matter. Postfix (can) uses its own little db format that makes things
faster, but retains compatibility with the /etc/aliases format (perhaps
you need to run postmap on it, by way of the newaliases command, but
iirc sendmail had a similar setup). If it
didn't we'd rightfully call it lunacy.
Hans Fugal ; http://hans.fugal.net
There's nothing remarkable about it. All one has to do is hit the
right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself.
-- Johann Sebastian Bach
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20070730/549ee3eb/attachment.bin
More information about the PLUG