brianhks at activeclickweb.com
Mon Feb 12 10:50:00 MST 2007
I don't understand how this can work. If I understand correctly they
want to have anyone who provides adult content to do so on a port other
than 80. So just how are they going to enforce that? Are they going to
put together a group that searches the Internet looking for porn that is
on 80. Are they then going to track them all down and fine them or some
Don't get me wrong I would love it to work, but it just sounds like a
Kenneth Burgener wrote:
> Michael L Torrie wrote:
>> I think ideas like this are not necessarily bad, but the implementation
>> can't possibly be anything but bad. I'd rather be empowered, as a
>> parent or administrator of a private network, to set my own policies and
> I am unsure why you think the implementation is bad. If you don't like
> the way they set it up, you have the option to ignore it...
> "A consumer who wants access to websites within non-compliant countries
> will continue to have access to all websites, worldwide. Thus each
> consumer's choice is unrestricted and flexible. "
> I think their setup has similar merits to movie ratings. I know movie
> ratings aren't perfect, but it at least gives you some idea of the type
> of content, which is better than nothing.
> I also think this benefits more then browsing children. Think about
> office browsing.
> PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> Don't fear the penguin.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3347 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20070212/4af66f66/attachment.bin
More information about the PLUG