Postgres vs. MSSQL
jonathan at carnageblender.com
Wed Nov 8 17:53:50 MST 2006
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:30:36 -0700, "Daniel C." <dcrookston at gmail.com>
> On 11/8/06, Roberto Mello <rmello at fslc.usu.edu> wrote:
> > Like what?
> Just list everything Postgres has that MySQL doesn't and there's your
> > I agree with Jonathan. PostgreSQL is easier to setup and maintain, just as
> > easy to use, and very well supported, although not as many off-the-street
> > hosting options.
> I don't think it's as easy to use when you're first learning. That's
> like saying that vi is as easy to use as pico. Once you know what
> you're doing, sure, it's even easier, but when you're learning, pico
> is much easier.
Not really; vi's obtuse interface has a learning cliff, not a curve.
A better analogy would be, would you rather have a nailgun, a circular
saw, and a drill, or just a claw hammer? :)
C++ is history repeated as tragedy. Java is history repeated as farce. --Scott McKay
More information about the PLUG