Postgres vs. MSSQL
dcrookston at gmail.com
Wed Nov 8 14:30:36 MST 2006
On 11/8/06, Roberto Mello <rmello at fslc.usu.edu> wrote:
> Like what?
Just list everything Postgres has that MySQL doesn't and there's your answer.
> I agree with Jonathan. PostgreSQL is easier to setup and maintain, just as
> easy to use, and very well supported, although not as many off-the-street
> hosting options.
I don't think it's as easy to use when you're first learning. That's
like saying that vi is as easy to use as pico. Once you know what
you're doing, sure, it's even easier, but when you're learning, pico
is much easier.
More information about the PLUG