New results from "dictionary word count" programs...

[Bryan Sant]

On 3/21/06, Derek <derek at burdick.cc> wrote:
> Here are the results with the 43mb kjv10
> Python wiht psyco
> real    0m6.148s
> user    0m5.732s
> sys     0m0.096s
>
> real    0m5.818s
> user    0m5.572s
> sys     0m0.052s
>
> real    0m6.266s
> user    0m5.976s
> sys     0m0.060s
>
> real    0m5.831s
> user    0m5.544s
> sys     0m0.088s
>
> C++ stlport
> real    0m3.152s
> user    0m2.960s
> sys     0m0.036s
>
> real    0m3.081s
> user    0m2.924s
> sys     0m0.024s
>
> real    0m3.395s
> user    0m3.264s
> sys     0m0.012s
>
> real    0m3.509s
> user    0m3.304s
> sys     0m0.028s

Way to bring me back to earth Derek :-).  I was pretty surprised that
C++ wasn't crushing everyone else.  With the proper lib, apparently it
does :-).

-Bryan