A Tangential Discourse on Lisp and the Lineage of Languages
bryan.sant at gmail.com
Sat Mar 11 19:09:27 MST 2006
On 3/11/06, Levi Pearson <levi at cold.org> wrote:
> Incidentally, Lisp has had native-code compilers since 1962, and
> incremental ones at that, which let you intermix interpreted and
> compiled code. Some implementations of Common Lisp today provide no
> interpreter at all, and simply compile every expression you give it
> before executing it. Having been used for so many years on hardware
> far less powerful than today's, it has very mature and sophisticated
> optimizing compilers. So, for dynamic applications that require a
> lot of indirection and reflection, Lisp provides excellent
> performance and unparalleled flexibility.
Sounds great. So when do we get to see the solution to Sasha's
dictionary problem implemented in Lisp? I'm dying to see the result.
More information about the PLUG