Apache - Windows vs Linux
Gregory_Hill at tni.com
Wed Jan 25 11:26:48 MST 2006
> Sounds like you were using Apache 1.3. Performance varies depending
> the use case. Apache in the past has been slower than IIS at serving
> static content. Apache 2.0 is much better in this regard. Even
> though, if performance is paramount, you need to use the Tux web
> to serve static content such as images, and then use apache to handle
> the dynamic stuff.
Well, we were using Apache 2.0 internally for testing, but the airline
doing the specific tests I was referring to may have been on 1.3. I
honestly don't remember.
More information about the PLUG