Apache - Windows vs Linux

[Gregory Hill]

> Sounds like you were using Apache 1.3.  Performance varies depending
on
> the use case.  Apache in the past has been slower than IIS at serving
> static content.  Apache 2.0 is much better in this regard.  Even
still,
> though, if performance is paramount, you need to use the Tux web
server
> to serve static content such as images, and then use apache to handle
> the dynamic stuff.

Well, we were using Apache 2.0 internally for testing, but the airline
doing the specific tests I was referring to may have been on 1.3.  I
honestly don't remember.

Greg