SSH hank attempts bad?

[Andrew McNabb]

On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:56:25AM -0600, Gregory Hill wrote:
> Since when did list netiquette involve personally attacking someone who
> didn't obey some rather arbitrary mailing list advice?

It's been that way as long as I can remember!


> A simple "most people would prefer if you trimmed your message"
> would've sufficed, IMO.

Probably, but Stuart needs an emotional release every once in a while.


> Either that, or buy one of those fandangled scroll-mice and quit
> caring how people prefer to reply.

Now there's a _stupid_ idea: justify bad etiquette by saying, "It's your
fault for being poor or efficient."

(Some one, please congratulate me for not resorting to ad hominem.)


-- 
Andrew McNabb
http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/
PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55  8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20060412/5997c8d2/attachment.bin