Thus said Lonnie Olson on Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:38:09 MDT: > Actually No. There is a newline before the next boundary, that is why > it comes on the next line. There is not an *extra* newline, however > that is not required. I'm sorry, but I don't believe that RFC 1521 and RFC 2049 agree with you... An *extra* newline is required. [RFC 1521] 7.2.1.