Any benefits of Nero over K3B?

[Hans Fugal]

On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 at 15:45 -0500, Jared Bernard wrote:
> 
> Nero for Linux
> http://ww2.nero.com/us/NeroLINUX.html
> 
> I'm a big fan of K3B, and I haven't really used Nero very much. Does Nero
>  have any features that "out do" or are missing from K3B or other current
>  Linux options? Basically, is it worth it to even have Nero added to the tons
>  of Linux CD burning apps out there?

Last time I used Nero, I loved how I could not for the life of me figure
out how to burn an ISO.

> Regardless, I think Nero for Linux is a positive for migration purposes. The
> more apps that run on both Windows and Linux, the better to "ease" users off
> the MS teat.

I agree, although this is one area where I have long felt the Linux
offerings are much better than the Windows offerings, free or
otherwise.

-- 
 .O.  Hans Fugal            | De gustibus non disputandum est.
 ..O  http://hans.fugal.net | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg
 OOO                        | WindowMaker, gaim, UTF-8, RISC, JS Bach
---------------------------------------------------------------------
GnuPG Fingerprint: 6940 87C5 6610 567F 1E95  CB5E FC98 E8CD E0AA D460
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20050313/aa999b26/attachment-0001.bin