redundant NICs

[Hans Fugal]

Great information, thanks. Sounds like bonding is the perfect solution.

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 at 10:07 -0600, Steve Jibson wrote:
> This is strictly set up for redundancy.  We do not want/need load-balancing.

But do you get it anyway? It seems you would with bonding, right?

-- 
 .O.  Hans Fugal            | De gustibus non disputandum est.
 ..O  http://hans.fugal.net | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg
 OOO                        | WindowMaker, gaim, UTF-8, RISC, JS Bach
---------------------------------------------------------------------
GnuPG Fingerprint: 6940 87C5 6610 567F 1E95  CB5E FC98 E8CD E0AA D460
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20050721/fd12b22d/attachment.bin