UT Lisp Users Group?

[Josh Coates]

>I refuse to get sucked into the php versus the world debate :-)

php? did you even rtfa?

the answer is D from Digital Mars.  geesh.  c'mon, get with the program and
rewriting your code in D.

Josh Coates
www.jcoates.org

-----Original Message-----
From: plug-bounces at plug.org [mailto:plug-bounces at plug.org] On Behalf Of Brad
Dorner
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:19 AM
To: Provo Linux Users Group Mailing List
Subject: RE: UT Lisp Users Group?

On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:55 -0600, Josh Coates wrote:

> hey there mr. straw man guy, he merely cited the paper as an example - 
> not proof.  and it *is* self evident that *some* language enable 
> greater productivity than others for *some* projects, and anyone who 
> disagrees with this is either naive or a fool.  i trust i don't need 
> to cite contrived and obvious examples, but let me know if you need any.
> 

Sorry, I must have taken his wording more seriously then he intended. 

> >No such thing as the perfect or best language.
> 
> wrong.  everyone knows that it has already been decided and proven 
> which language is best.  it says right here in this here graph:
> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=sumcol<=all
> &s
> ort=fullcpu
> 

I refuse to get sucked into the php versus the world debate :-)

brad

.===================================.
| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
|      Don't Fear the Penguin.      |
|  IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net   |
`==================================='